Blackshirts and Reds Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism kindle ☆ eBook 9780872863293 Free ☆ johnscyclingdiary

Michael Parenti ↠ Blackshirts and Reds Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism pdf

Blackshirts and Reds Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism kindle ☆ eBook 9780872863293 Free ☆ johnscyclingdiary ☆ ❮KINDLE❯ ✾ Blackshirts and Reds Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism Author Michael PaNgoing collision between ecology and global corporatismWritten with lucid and compelling style this book goes beyond truncated modes of thought inviting us to entertain iconoclastic views and to ask why things are as they are It is a bold and entertaining exploration of the epic struggles of and Reds Rational Fascism and MOBI #233 yesterday and todayA penetrating and persuasive writer with an and Reds Rational Fascism and MOBI #233 astonishing array of documentation to implement his attacks The Catholic Journalist Blackshirts Reds discusses the great combat between fascism and socialism that is the defining feature of the Twentieth Century and takes every official version to task for its substitution of moral analysis for critical analysis for its selectivity and for its errata By portraying the struggle between fascism and Communism in this century Surprisingly disappointing and I say this as someone who agrees with virtually everything Parenti says in this book The most frustrating aspect of his writing is how infreuently he uses citations He makes a number of great points about both Communism and Capitalism though the latter are mostly truisms any Marxist knows but he rarely gives one access to further reading A good polemic but a bit outdated and definitely too schematic I would recommend individual chapters his early ones on the fall of Communism are the best but not the book as a whole Maybe though my critiue has to do with the fact that much of what he states is obvious to me so maybe that's my problem but his writing definitely suffers from a number of oversimplifications which would make it easy for any Liberal to dismiss his arguments in a second

reader ✓ Blackshirts and Reds Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism ↠ Michael Parenti

As a single conflict and not a series of discrete encounters between the insatiable need for new capital on the one hand and the survival of a system under siege on the other Parenti defines fascism as the weapon of capitalism not simply an extreme form of it Fascism is not an aberration he points out but a rational and integral component of the system Stan Goff The PrismMichael Parenti PhD Yale is an internationally known author and lecturer He is one of the nation's leadiing progressive political analysts He is the author of over published articles and twenty books His writings are published in popular periodicals scholarly journals and his op ed pieces have been in leading newspapers such as The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times His informative and entertaining books and talks have reached a wide range of audiences in North America and abroa Michael Parenti is a voice of sanity in these dark times when there exists a not too small section of self important self indulgent intellectuals who pretend to be on the Left and are too uick to be swayed by capitalist realism and unhelpful pessimism downplaying the relevance of Marxism going even so far as to fall in line with those trends of thought which euate communism with fascism I can only give a statutory warning to those who fall in this category advising them NOT to pick up this book because beware folks your hands are about to get burned

reader Blackshirts and Reds Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism

Blackshirts and Reds Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of CommunismBlackshirts Reds explores some Reds Rational Epub #181 of the big issues of our time fascism capitalism communism revolution democracy and ecology terms often bandied about but seldom explored in the original and exciting way that has become Michael Parenti’s trademarkParenti shows how “rational fascism” renders service to capitalism how corporate power undermines democracy and how revolutions are Blackshirts and PDF a mass empowerment against the forces of exploitative privilege He also maps out the external and internal forces that destroyed communism and the disastrous impact of the “free market” victory on eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union He affirms the relevance of taboo ideologies like Marxism demonstrating the importance of class analysis in and Reds Rational PDF #9734 understanding political realities and dealing with the o Best chapters 6 7 8 9 6 and 7 show really well just how disastrous the end of socialism was and 8 and 9 are a pretty good introduction todefence of Marxism as a way of understanding the world although from a certain perspective that's very Parenti kind of reductive proto 99% stuff although I don't mean that in a bad way 1 and 2 are also pretty decent 1 goes into how fascists were actually supported by capitalists for entirely rational class based reasons 2 talks about how revolutions are good and violent revolution is forced by the ruling class The big problem with these 2 is their lack of detail on some stuff 3 is a bit eh about left anticommunism like I agree with a decent amount of it but sometimes it feels a little unfair but mostly cause it starts talking about the Soviet Union and it's like hmm Chapter 4 and 5 are pretty bad although I appreciate pointing out how exaggerated the totalitarian claim is even if it's only vaguely pointed out Bizarrely chapter 4 almost descends into right anti communism The rest of this review will probably sound weirdIn chapter 4 Parenti describes problems of the USSR economy post WW2 and it sounds like an ultra leftist's dream societyNot surprisingly work discipline left much to be desired There was the clerk who chatted endlessly with a friend on the telephone while a long line of people waited resentfully for service the two workers who took three days to paint a hotel wall that should have taken a few hours the many who would walk off their jobs to go shoppingThe autonomists would be proud I feel he really sells the system short here repeating the old claim that central planning was too inefficient if so what is the advantage of socialism at all Outside of the idea of totalitarianism it feels like he endorses near every Western view about the inefficiencies of the socialist system Yet it's clear from what he says elsewhere that even with these inefficiencies the USSR was able to deliver a decent standard of living for everyone To have a whole chapter chapter 4 which is a weird bashing of the socialist states and featuring many claims about disincentives to work and even human nature is kind of frustrating cause it feels so out of place Here another big problem of his style of writing shines through his reluctance to actually cite anything Big claims don't get cited even when they're controversial For me it's most noticeable here because so much is basically anecdotal evidence treated as wider fact but it re occurs throughout the book and weakens his persuasiveness if you disagree with the left in general you're just going to be asking for evidence regularly and in this chapter you're going to be asking for evidence if you're a communistMaybe Parenti is a bit of a Bukharinite In chapter 3 while endorsing the autocratic economic direction that the USSR actually took in order to build up an industrial base he sees and endorses a second path moving in a liberalized direction allowing polit­ical diversity autonomy for labor unions and other organiza­tions open debate and criticism greater autonomy among the various Soviet republics a sector of privately owned small busi­nesses independent agricultural development by the peasantry greater emphasis on consumer goods and less effort given to the kind of capital accumulation needed to build a strong military­ industrial base The latter course I believe would have produced a com­fortable humane and serviceable society Siege socialism would have given way to worker consumer socialism It's hard to disagree with the idea of union autonomy etc exactly but stuff like privately owned small businesses Certainly an unusual take on communism kind of Yugoslavite The decision by Soviet leaders to achieve military parity with the United States while working from a much smaller industrial base placed a serious strain on the entire Soviet economy while at the same time recognising that the USSR was still in a state of siege even then it wasn't so much a decision as a reaction to the circumstances forced upon them something he accepts while taking about pre WW2 USSR This isn't to say that the military spending was right and proper or anything but it wasn't some strange bolt from the blue the thing about the siege socialism he describes is that it was never able to end because socialism was always under siegeHe's great at writing against the USA and against anti communism but he's much worse at mounting an effective defence of socialist countries He devotes a couple pages maybe to pointing out things that are genuinely worth shouting about far higher life expectancies universal literacy healthcare access to culture much reduced homelessness and unemployment etc but that's about it Yes it's clear from what he says about the collapse of socialism that it was an absolute disaster chapters 6 and 7 are blistering polemic really great writing but that doesn't really convince the uninitiated that communist ideologies are good Instead he mounts an attack on the incredibly inflated death count attributed to the USSR and Stalin specifically but it's not particularly inspiring to read oh well only 2 million people were in the gulags or something especially when it's tied with portrayal of Stalin as purely some weird power hungry dictator there's no wider class or historical explanation of what happened past the talk of a siege For most genuinely curious people the uestion is less well how many people did Stalin kill and if a significant number of people died or were killed how can we stop this happening again if I support communism I just feel it's not very convincing from that perspective and it's almost just missing the point Even if the death counts are massively inflated those deaths are still horrifying Parenti completely acknowledges this and attacks Stalin but because he can't provide any explanations or give any alternatives it's not a promising or convincing defence Maybe I'm harping on about this a bit much but it's a confusing and very limited defence of the USSR to a large extent it's only defended because it was better than what followedthe USA even though in reality there was a lot to it I dunno I'm not much of an expert on the USSR myself The chapters I said at the start are good but not good enough to overcome my hesitation about the chapters I didn't like But I do really appreciate how easy to read his writing style is